The claim goes like this. Your body can only absorb about thirty grams of protein in one sitting, so anything past that is wasted.
You have heard it from a magazine, a trainer, or a well-meaning friend. It is one of the most repeated things in the whole of nutrition.
It is also false, and the consequence of believing it is that a great many women eat considerably less protein than they need while feeling responsible about it.
Where the number came from
It is not invented from nothing, which is why it has survived.
Early studies measured muscle protein synthesis after whey-only shakes, mostly in young men, over a few hours. In those narrow conditions, the muscle-building response plateaus somewhere around twenty to thirty grams.
That is a real finding. What happened next is that a specific result, from a specific dose of a specific protein in a specific population over a short window, got repeated as a universal ceiling on absorption.
Absorption is not capped. Your body absorbs protein well beyond thirty grams and puts it to work in a range of ways.
What a bigger dose actually does
A 2023 study published in Cell Reports Medicine compared twenty five grams of protein against one hundred grams after resistance exercise.
The hundred gram dose produced a greater and more prolonged anabolic response, lasting over twelve hours.
Not a plateau, and not waste. A bigger and longer response.
That does not mean you should eat a hundred grams at a sitting. It means the ceiling everybody talks about is not where they think it is, and probably is not a ceiling.
The part that matters more if you are over forty five
Here is the finding I actually want you to leave with, because it runs directly opposite to what most women assume.
Older adults need more protein per meal than younger adults, not less.
It is called anabolic resistance. Ageing muscle responds less strongly to a given dose of protein, so it takes more of it to trigger the same building response. In practical terms, older adults need roughly three grams of leucine per meal to fully switch on muscle protein synthesis, against about two and a half for younger adults. That works out at somewhere around thirty to forty grams of good quality protein per meal, where a younger adult might get there on twenty to thirty.
This part is genuinely settled and well replicated. It is not the contested edge of the field.
So the woman most likely to have been told to be careful about protein is the woman who needs the most of it per meal.
How much across the day
The government RDA is 0.8 grams per kilogram of body weight per day. That figure is a floor, built from studies designed to prevent deficiency, not to keep muscle on an ageing body. It is not dangerous and it is not a scandal. It is simply not aimed at what you are aiming at.
Research using better methods puts the real requirement for older adults higher, in the range of 1.1 to 1.3 grams per kilogram. Expert bodies recommend 1.0 to 1.2 for healthy older adults, and 1.2 to 1.5 for those who are training hard or unwell.
You will also come across considerably higher numbers, particularly from Dr Stacy Sims, who recommends 1.7 to 2.4 grams per kilogram for women, with peri and post-menopausal women aiming at the top of that. I am certified in her work and it informs how I coach.
I want to be straight about the status of that number, though. It sits well above the peer-reviewed ageing literature. It is a coaching recommendation aimed at active, training women, at the high end of what is currently being argued about, rather than a settled figure with matching population trials behind it. That is a fair thing to work towards with a coach. It is not a fact, and I am not going to present it as one.
Spreading it out
Even distribution beats loading it all at dinner. The often-cited work here found muscle protein synthesis around twenty five per cent greater when protein was spread evenly across three meals rather than concentrated in the evening.
Whether breakfast specifically is special is more mixed than the internet suggests. One study found better grip strength in people who habitually ate high protein at breakfast. Another found a protein-heavy breakfast with a lighter dinner was roughly equivalent to the reverse, at the same daily total.
So the defensible version is simple. Hit your daily total, spread it across three or four meals, and try not to let any single meal fall below about thirty grams.
Two honest caveats
Kidneys. McMaster researchers reviewed dozens of studies and found no evidence linking high protein diets to kidney disease in healthy people, including people with obesity, high blood pressure or type 2 diabetes. It is not unanimous, and long-term trial data is thin. What is not in question is that high protein is a genuinely different matter if you already have kidney disease. If you do, talk to your doctor before changing anything.
Plant protein. Animal and dairy protein is more leucine-dense gram for gram. Whey is around eleven to thirteen per cent leucine by weight, soy around eight to nine. That gap is real, and it is closable by eating a larger portion. When total protein and leucine are matched, plant protein produces comparable results.
Where this comes from
- The 25g versus 100g comparison: Trommelen et al. 2023, Cell Reports Medicine. Lay summary of the mechanism.
- Anabolic resistance and the leucine threshold: Frontiers in Nutrition systematic review.
- Protein requirements in ageing: Deutz et al., Nutrients 2016 and Protein Consumption and the Elderly.
- Dr Stacy Sims’s recommendation: How Much Protein Is Enough? Flagged above as a coaching recommendation at the high end of current debate, not settled population science.
- Distribution across meals: Cell Reports and PMC8048646.
- Protein and kidney function in healthy people: McMaster University.
- Plant versus animal protein, matched for leucine: PMC7312446.
Fourteen days of training with Lachlan, at no cost to you.
All writing. Published 7 September 2026.